[讨论]VAC、HLGUARD、CD三种主要反作弊软件效果比较。

zhoukov · 发表于 2003-3-14 09:13:25

请对以上三种反作弊软件效果进行比较，要从以下几个方面：
1、反作弊的有效性，能否防住目前作弊软件的所有的版本。
2、与作弊软件斗争的积极性，也就是更新速度。
3、对CS服务器造成的影响。
4、对玩家使用的方便程度。

zhoukov · 发表于 2003-3-14 09:24:17

我个人的比较：
1、CD最好。
2、VAC更新最快（但不一定都有效），其次是目前的CD，最后是HLGUARD。HLGUARD总是最慢，直到所有的作弊软件都防不住了，才进行更新。
3、CD对服务器造成的影响最小，反正我采用CD后，服务器不再LAG。
4、VAC不仅对玩家使用方便，CS服务器维护者同样方便，几乎不需要维护者干预，而HLGUARD只需要维护者进行插件的安装。CD则需要维护者和玩家分别安装服务器端和客户端。
我的结论：CD最好。虽然最大的麻烦是玩家必须下载安装其客户端，但真正的不作弊的CS玩家是不嫌麻烦的。
建议：如果你的服务器足够好，可以HLGUARD与CD组合安装，或者VAC与HLGUARD组合安装。如果你的服务器性能太差，那么只有CD就足够用了。

匿名 *发表于 2003-3-14 10:39:57* 来自 Invalid · 发表于 2003-3-14 10:39:57

1－200k的cd又怎么算大呢？
cd最好
：）

xuxianhe · 发表于 2003-3-14 11:02:42

其实hlguard是可以订制的，你们打开配置文件看看，lag是由于hlg默认的扫描太频繁了，你可以自行设定以下，我做了适当修改之后，lag情况已经大大减小了！
vac+hlg最好，与客户端无关，不用安装client，比较受玩家欢迎！

Simba · 发表于 2003-3-14 11:30:19

我基本同意搂主的看法
VAC我没用过,但从它的特性来看（使用＆升级方便，无需客户端）是其他反作弊软件的发展方向,据我所知有很多玩家是电脑盲无需客户端太棒了!
hlg 也是不用客户端,但是更新慢是他最大缺点,而且占用资源大 ,弊大于利不推荐用
CD 是目前最看好的反作弊软件,更新快效果好,但是应为需要客户端支持而不可避免的会出现不兼容的问题

排一下顺序
cd ,vac ,hlg
我主要是按效果排的
世上没有万能药最好还是交叉使用
cd+vac 因该是最佳派党可是他们偏偏不兼容
而其他组合必要性不大,一般服务器只装cd就可以了 ,也可以再装些其他的插件增加娱乐性,最热闹的是SM.

蔷薇骑士 · 发表于 2003-3-14 11:42:20

对于C-D，必须要更多的高级编程人员来一起努力，降低误判的概率。实际上我现在也不知道这在技术上是不是可能的。在未来，OpenGL的作弊最后可能会和驱动程序紧密绑定在一起，C-D不得不放弃目前的探测方式，否则不管玩家是否作弊，OpenGL显示方式的玩家都将不能进入C-D服务器，那会是Anti－Cheat 的灾难...

让我们来看看OGC黑暗世界的复仇...

After reading through the board of UnitedAdmins, I have to clear two things up.

Firstly, I want to stress that OGC was not (and will never be) involved and in any flooding targeted against UA, as at least one thread in their board was claiming. We were subject to floods, too. However, our servers seemed to handle it better

Secondly, the `Cheating-Death` development team around [DRS]Hullu seems to have major problems after they have included the detection of our OpenGL Hack v2.6 into their C-D v2.3.0. The problems are caused by the special GL-hook method, used in our GLhack. It digs deep into the GL-system, which causes C-D`s detection to class 3dfx, ATI, and some GeForce drivers as `modification` (C-D Codes 32 and 33). Furthermore, some sound-drivers are causing incompatibilities... UA`s board contains tons of reports regarding those problems, even after releasing v2.3.1 and v2.3.2 of their so-called `AntiCheat client`.

It`s (kind of) funny to see that UA is actually telling the C-D users to turn off MSN Messenger, Firewalls and Anti-Virus software while playing with C-D! After all, those applications are actually good for something ... so as long as the C-D dev team cannot create a working AntiCheat, people have to play with insecure systems? Hail UA!

The next generation of cheats will require much more skill in order to be detected, to say the least! For example, the next hook-method of our GLhack will dig even deeper into the system, but working for everyone who can use OpenGL (at the moment, some drivers make problems). If that method turns out to be reliable, I will pack it into a seperate component so any developer can use it without knowing how it actually hooks.

Time will tell whether the C-D dev-team will keep putting code-snippets together or learn how to code!
So, there`s not much left for anti-cheaters except claiming that cheaters are beaten, when - in fact - cheats like our GLhack are causing many many problems even after they have been detected.

Hope dies last...

InvidentXp · 发表于 2003-3-14 13:24:05

...
CD无敌

恍若如梦 · 发表于 2003-3-14 13:45:11

可怕,可怕

Smart · 发表于 2003-3-14 14:53:42

cd太麻烦
HLG太耗费资源
所以还是选用vac比较划算

Simba · 发表于 2003-3-14 16:18:39

我是英盲
麻烦哪位过5-6级的给翻翻
让大家看清楚
谢谢:29: